Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Audi A3 Sportback vs Nissan Rogue Sport

Trunk comparison: Audi A3 Sportback vs Nissan Rogue Sport

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Audi A3 Sportback and Nissan Rogue Sport
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Audi A3 Sportback and Nissan Rogue Sport

Key Differences (highlighted >10%)

In comparison, the following stands out: The Nissan Qashqai offers more trunk length — +6.3 in (+11%) with seats folded down and +3.9 in (+13%) with the first row upright compared to the Audi A3 Sportback.

The width of the trunk opening is significantly larger in the Qashqai — +5.9 in (+15%), which increases the pass-through area for wide or bulky items.

The loading edge of the Qashqai is higher above the road — +3.9 in (+15%), meaning more lift is required when loading from the ground.

The Audi A3 Sportback has a significantly greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor — +3.9 in (+167%) compared to the Qashqai; the trunk floor is therefore considerably lower below the loading edge.

Impact on Usability

Loading operations and bulky cargo: Due to the longer loading surface (both with seats folded and upright) and the wider opening, the Qashqai is better suited for longer or wider items such as furniture parts, long sports equipment, or wide boxes.

The larger opening width makes loading bulky items significantly easier.

Loading ergonomics: The higher loading edge of the Qashqai makes lifting heavy loads from the ground more challenging — frequent lifting of heavy items is less favorable than in the Audi.

The Audi benefits here from a lower loading edge (relatively speaking) and especially from the greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor: the cargo space sits deeper below the loading edge, which can make sliding or lowering items in easier in some cases, but at the same time, a very deep cargo area can be inconvenient when reaching inside.

Everyday practicality: For users who regularly need to transport long or wide items (e.g., craftsmen, families with large luggage needs, transport of flat packages), the Qashqai has the advantage.

For users who frequently load heavy luggage or shopping bags and value ergonomic loading, the Audi can be more practical due to the lower floor position and lower loading edge.

Smaller differences such as the height of the trunk opening (+1.2 in / 4%) or the narrowest width (+2 in / 5%) are minor and have less impact on everyday usability.