Trunk comparison: Audi A4 Avant vs Dacia Jogger

Key Differences

The Dacia Jogger offers significantly more usable width and a notably deeper trunk geometry than the Audi A4 Avant. Specifically, the narrowest point of the Jogger's trunk is 8.7 in (22%) wider, and the depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is 1.2 in (60%) greater than in the A4 Avant.

Other, smaller differences: with the seats folded down, the A4 Avant is 1.6 in (2%) longer; with the first row of seats upright, the Jogger is 4.3 in (10%) longer; the Jogger's trunk opening is 2.8 in (8%) higher, the width of the opening only 0.4 in (1%) wider, and the Jogger's loading edge is 1.2 in (5%) higher above the ground.

Implications for Usability

Due to the significantly greater width at the narrowest point, the Jogger is easier to load with wide or bulky items (e.g., furniture parts, large boxes, sports equipment).

The greater depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor means more volume fits into a deeper "well" — this helps when storing irregularly shaped or stackable cargo but may reduce visibility and can make lifting heavy items in somewhat less convenient.

The 4.3 in longer loading floor with the first row of seats upright (10%) makes the Jogger more practical when seating is needed and longer items must be transported simultaneously; conversely, the A4 Avant gains slightly in length when all seats are folded down (2%), which hardly matters in everyday use.

The higher trunk opening of the Jogger (8%) facilitates loading tall items, while the slightly higher loading edge (5%) minimally complicates heavy lifting.

In summary: For users who frequently transport wide or deep, irregular, and bulky cargo, the Dacia Jogger offers noticeable advantages. The Audi A4 Avant remains a more compact vehicle with a slightly different trunk geometry but is less advantageous than the Jogger in terms of loading versatility.