Trunk comparison: Audi A6 Avant vs Skoda Elroq

Main Differences (highlighted: >10%)

The Audi A6 Avant offers significantly more usable trunk length: With the seats folded down, the A6 is 11.4 in (17%) longer, and with the first row of seats upright, it is even 14.6 in (46%) longer than the Škoda Elroq.

This clearly makes the Audi superior for transporting long items (e.g., furniture parts, long sports equipment, boards) and more often allows bulky cargo to be stored without further seat folding or without front passengers needing to move.

The depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor) is 0.4 in (100%) greater in the Audi. Although the percentage figure seems large, the absolute difference is only 0.4 in.

Practically, this means a minimal increase in usable depth and a slightly altered loading profile; for most everyday cases, the effect is hardly noticeable.

Further Differences and Impact on Usability

The Škoda’s trunk opening is 1.2 in (4%) higher than the Audi’s, providing slightly more vertical pass-through height — useful for taller items, but the difference is small.

At the same time, the Škoda’s loading edge is 2 in (8%) higher above the road than the Audi’s; this increases the effort required to lift heavy loads in or out and makes loading and unloading heavy items somewhat less comfortable.

In width, there is no difference at the narrowest point; the width of the trunk opening is only 0.4 in (1%) larger in the Audi, which is also negligible.

Conclusion

For buyers who frequently transport long or very bulky cargo, the Audi A6 Avant is clearly advantageous due to the significantly greater length (especially with the first row of seats upright).

For everyday use and smaller shopping trips, the other differences bring hardly any practical disadvantages or advantages: the Škoda has a slightly higher opening, the Audi a marginally deeper loading floor and a lower loading edge, which can slightly ease handling heavy loads.