Trunk comparison: Audi A6 Avant vs Skoda Kamiq

Key Differences

The Audi A6 Avant offers significantly more loading length: with the seats folded down, the trunk is 16.9 in (≈28%) longer, and with the first row of seats upright, it is also 16.9 in (≈58%) longer than in the Škoda Kamiq.

The Škoda Kamiq, on the other hand, has a higher opening height and a significantly deeper cargo area: the trunk opening is 4.3 in (≈15%) higher and the depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is 5.5 in (≈700%) greater than in the A6. Smaller differences: the Kamiq’s loading edge is 2.4 in (≈9%) higher above the road, the narrowest trunk width of the A6 is only 0.4 in larger, and the opening width of the A6 is 0.8 in larger — both values are negligible for everyday use.

Impact on Usability

Loading length (advantage A6): Due to the significantly greater loading length, the A6 Avant is better suited for long items (e.g., boards, skis, furniture parts) and for maximum usable cargo volume with folded seats.

Those who frequently transport long or flat loads will find the A6 clearly the more practical solution.

Opening height and depth (advantage Kamiq): The higher opening makes it easier to load tall items without hitting the roof edge.

The greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor means more space "downwards" in the cargo area — useful for bulky, cubic cargo or when luggage needs to be well recessed. However, the slightly higher loading edge (by 2.4 in) requires somewhat more lifting effort when loading.

Practical conclusion: For length-oriented transports and maximum loading length, the Audi A6 Avant is the better choice. For storing taller, bulky, or awkward items that benefit from a larger opening and more interior depth, the Škoda Kamiq is advantageous.

Small width differences hardly matter in everyday use; the choice primarily depends on whether length (A6) or opening/depth comfort (Kamiq) is more important.