Trunk comparison: Audi A6 Sedan vs Durchschnitt Compact SUV

Key Differences

Significant differences mainly concern cargo length and vertical dimensions. The Audi A6 offers with folded seats a cargo space that is 18.1 in (31%) longer and with the first row of seats upright a cargo space that is 15 in (49%) longer than the average of the compact SUV segment.

In contrast, the trunk opening of the compact SUV is 11.4 in (58%) higher than that of the A6. Additionally, the depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor) of the compact SUV is 0.8 in (17%) larger and the loading edge is 3.1 in (12%) higher above the road.

Smaller differences (<10%) in width are present (A6 at the narrowest point +1.6 in; opening width compact SUV +1.2 in), but they are hardly decisive.

Implications for Usability

The Audi A6 is clearly better suited for long, flat loads: skis, long furniture parts, or large boxes benefit from the significantly greater cargo length both with folded seats and in everyday mode.

The lower loading edge of the A6 makes loading heavy items easier (less lifting). A disadvantage is the lower trunk opening/interior height: very tall items are less likely to fit standing up.

The compact SUV, on the other hand, offers more vertical space: due to the significantly higher trunk opening and the slightly greater depth, taller or bulkier items can be better accommodated (plants, tall boxes, stacked luggage).

However, the higher loading edge makes lifting heavy loads somewhat more difficult, and the shorter cargo length makes the SUV less suitable for very long items.

Conclusion: Those who frequently transport long, flat loads or prefer easier lifting are better served by the Audi A6. Those who more often transport tall or bulky items and benefit from more vertical space will find the compact SUV the more suitable solution.