Trunk comparison: Audi A6 Sedan vs Jeep Compass

Key Differences (highlighted: >10%)

The Audi A6 has a trunk that is 11.8 in (18%) longer when all seats are folded down, and 13 in (40%) longer trunk space when the first row of seats is upright, compared to the Jeep Compass.

The Jeep Compass features a significantly higher opening height: the height of the trunk opening is 13.8 in (70%) greater than that of the Audi A6. Likewise, the depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor) in the Jeep is 1.6 in (33%) greater.

The loading edge of the Jeep is 4.3 in (17%) higher above the road than that of the Audi A6.

Implications for Usability

The longer loading surface in the Audi A6 (with folded and upright seats) makes it better suited for long items like skis, furniture boards, or longer boxes — these can be laid flatter and pushed further back. Even with full seating, the A6 offers more usable depth for stacked luggage due to the longer loading area.

The Jeep Compass offers more vertical space and a greater distance from loading edge to ground, which benefits tall or bulky items: bulky boxes, large cartons, or strollers fit more easily in height, and the larger opening height facilitates loading taller cargo.

However, the higher loading edge makes lifting heavy items into the vehicle more difficult — for heavy loads, the lower entry of the Audi A6 is advantageous.

The slightly greater width at the narrowest point in the Audi (+2 in / 5%) is hardly decisive in everyday use; the 3.5 in (10%) wider trunk opening of the Jeep is exactly 10% and was not highlighted here as >10%.

Overall: Audi A6 = better for long, flat cargo and easier lifting; Jeep Compass = better for tall, bulky cargo and greater vertical freedom of movement, but with a higher loading edge.