Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Audi A6 Sedan vs Skoda Elroq

Trunk comparison: Audi A6 Sedan vs Skoda Elroq

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Audi A6 Sedan and Skoda Elroq
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Audi A6 Sedan and Skoda Elroq

Key Differences

The Audi A6 offers significantly more cargo length: +11 in (17%) with the seats folded down and +13.8 in (44%) with the first row upright compared to the Škoda Elroq.

The Škoda Elroq has a considerably higher trunk opening: +10.2 in (52%) in opening height compared to the Audi. Additionally, the depth of the trunk (loading edge → trunk floor) is significantly greater in the Audi: +4.3 in (1100%).

Small or less than 10% differences: the loading edge of the Elroq is only +1.2 in (5%) higher above the ground, the narrowest trunk width is only +0.8 in (2%) larger in the Audi, and the opening width of the Elroq is +3.5 in (10%) — these values are structurally relevant but noticeably less pronounced.

Implications for Usability

More cargo length in the Audi means longer items (e.g., slats, skis, furniture parts) can be transported more easily, both with folded seats and with normal seating. For users who frequently carry long cargo, the Audi is therefore more practical.

The greater depth of the Audi (loading edge → floor) creates more usable interior space in the longitudinal/height direction and allows for deeper stowing of bulky cargo.

At the same time, a significantly larger step between the loading edge and the interior floor can occur, which may make handling heavy items during loading and unloading more difficult.

The significantly higher trunk opening of the Škoda Elroq makes it easier to load tall or bulky items (e.g., boxes, plants, tall furniture parts) without strong angling. Together with the slightly larger opening width (nearly 10%), this makes the Elroq advantageous for transporting bulky, tall goods.

In summary: Audi A6 = better for long and deep cargo; Škoda Elroq = better for tall, bulky items and generally easier maneuvering of large heights. Smaller differences in loading edge height and narrowest width have only minor practical impact.