Trunk comparison: Audi Q5 vs Dacia Jogger

Main Differences

The Dacia Jogger offers significantly more usable length with the upright first row of seats than the Audi Q5: +8.3 in (22%) — 22% more. The height of the Jogger's trunk opening is +5.1 in (16%) higher — 16% more vertical space.

At the narrowest point, the Jogger's trunk is +7.1 in (17%) wider — 17% more passage width. In contrast, the loading edge of the Audi Q5 sits +3.1 in (12%) higher above the ground than the Jogger — 12% higher loading edge.

Less relevant are the differences that are ≤10%: With seats fully folded down, the Jogger is only +5.1 in (8%) longer, and the width of the trunk opening is +10% larger (exactly 10%) on the Audi. The depth of the trunk (loading edge to floor) is the same for both models.

Impact on Usability

The biggest practical advantages of the Jogger lie in everyday use: The 22% greater length with the first row upright allows transporting longer items (e.g., skis, furniture parts, strollers) without folding seats.

The higher trunk opening (+16%) makes it easier to accommodate tall/bulky items due to more vertical clearance. The 17% greater narrowest width means that wide or irregularly shaped loads are less likely to get stuck at tight spots.

The Audi Q5 scores partly when loading through the opening (opening width slightly larger), but has a 12% higher loading edge, which makes lifting heavy items harder and loading/unloading more physically demanding.

Since the trunk depth is identical and the advantage with fully folded seats is only about 8% in favor of the Jogger, the models become more comparable at maximum cargo space.

Conclusion: For frequent transport of tall or wide loads as well as longer items with the rear seat upright, the Dacia Jogger is more practical. The Audi Q5 offers a slightly wider opening but is less comfortable for frequent loading and unloading due to the higher loading edge.