Trunk comparison: Audi Q7 vs Dacia Jogger

Key Differences (highlighted: >10%)

The Audi Q7 offers a longer cargo area with the seats folded down: +9.4 in (13%) longer trunk space compared to the Dacia Jogger. With the seats upright, the difference of +1.2 in (3%) is negligible.

The Dacia Jogger has a significantly higher trunk opening: +6.7 in (23%), and the depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor in the Jogger is +3.1 in (700%) greater than in the Q7. The narrowest interior width is +5.1 in (12%) wider in the Jogger.

The loading edge of the Audi Q7 sits higher above the ground: +4.7 in (18%) compared to the Jogger. Conversely, the width of the trunk opening in the Q7 is +7.1 in (17%) larger than in the Jogger.

Implications for Usability

Space for long items: Due to the longer overall length with folded seats in the Q7, significantly longer items can be accommodated better. For furniture or long pipes, the Q7 is more practical.

Loading comfort and vertical space: The Jogger offers a higher opening and a lower trunk floor (greater depth between loading edge and floor).

This means more usable height under the opening and easier access to interior height — at the same time, a more pronounced step behind the loading edge occurs when loading. The lower loading edge height of the Jogger makes lifting heavy items easier.

Loading width vs. opening width: Inside the cargo area, the Jogger is wider at its narrowest point, so bulky, cumbersome goods fit better. However, the Q7 has a significantly larger opening width, which facilitates inserting wide, flat parts (e.g., panels) — though it may be tighter inside afterward.

Conclusion: For transport tasks requiring long items, the Audi Q7 has the advantage. For frequent loading of heavy or tall/voluminous goods (easier lifting due to lower loading edge, larger opening, and more interior width), the Dacia Jogger is more practical.

Smaller differences like the +1.2 in trunk space with the front seats upright are hardly relevant in everyday use.