Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Audi Q7 vs Renault Austral

Trunk comparison: Audi Q7 vs Renault Austral

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Audi Q7 and Renault Austral
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Audi Q7 and Renault Austral

Biggest Differences

The Audi Q7 offers a significantly longer loading length with the rear seats folded down: +16.9 in (27%) compared to the Renault Austral. Even with the first row of seats upright, the Q7 is longer: +13 in (38%).

In contrast, the Renault Austral has a significantly greater trunk depth (distance from loading edge to trunk floor): +3.1 in (700%) compared to the Q7.

What are the implications for usability?

The longer loading areas of the Q7 mean that longer items can be transported better – such as slats, longer boxes, skis, or long furniture parts.

This advantage is evident both with fully folded seats and, important for everyday situations, when the first row remains upright: the Q7 allows significantly more cargo space behind the seats.

The greater depth of the Austral (the floor lies further below the loading edge) has two practical effects: on the one hand, flat or lower-placed loads can be stored somewhat lower and thus more stably; on the other hand, the usable interior height under the tailgate changes — this can either hinder or facilitate loading very tall items, depending on the shape of the cargo.

Additionally, a lower loading floor means that when loading and unloading, lifting heavy items may require a greater lift height.

Smaller differences (e.g., slightly greater width at the narrowest point and wider trunk opening in the Q7, as well as a slightly higher opening height in the Q7) fall below the 10% threshold and only moderately affect practical use: the Q7 is overall slightly wider, which makes fitting wider items easier, while the Austral's deeper floor primarily affects handling of low or tall cargo.