Trunk comparison: BMW 5 Series Touring vs Renault Clio
Key Differences (highlighted: >10%)
The BMW 5 Series Touring offers a significantly longer cargo area with the rear seats folded down: +22.8 in (44%) more length than the Renault Clio.
Even with the front seats upright, the BMW remains +15 in (54%) longer. The loading edge of the BMW is noticeably higher above the road: +16.5 in (175%) compared to the Clio.
Also very striking is the stated depth (loading edge to trunk floor) of the Clio, which is indicated as +30.3 in (7600%) greater – this extreme percentage suggests very different measurement definitions or a measurement error, but it clearly indicates a geometric difference between the vehicles.
Impact on Usability
The greater length of the BMW (both with folded seats and with upright seats) makes it more practical for transporting long items such as slats, furniture parts, skis, or longer luggage. Those who regularly transport bulky or long cargo clearly have the advantage in the 5 Series Touring.
However, the significantly higher loading edge of the BMW increases the effort required when loading and unloading heavy items: more frequent lifting effort, less back-friendly, and less convenient when loading boxes or large bags.
The Clio with its lower loading edge is better suited for everyday use here — especially for frequent loading and unloading in city traffic or when shopping.
The much greater "depth" of the Clio (as stated) points to a different interior geometry that can be advantageous when loading tall or bulky items; due to the unusually high percentage, this figure should be interpreted with caution.
Width measurements (narrowest point and opening width) are close between the models (each only ±6%), and they hardly play a decisive role in everyday use.
Conclusion: For longer or bulky cargo and larger trunk volume, the BMW 5 Series Touring is the better choice. For simple, frequent loading and unloading, typical city use, and more ergonomic handling of heavy shopping, the Renault Clio is more practical.
Given the extreme figure for the Clio's depth, a precise measurement check or inquiry about the measurement method is recommended.