Trunk comparison: BMW 5 Series Touring vs Skoda Elroq

Key Differences

The most notable difference lies in the loading length: With the seats folded down, the BMW offers a loading area that is 9.1 in (14%) longer than the Škoda. With the rear seat bench upright, the gap even increases to 11.4 in (36%) in favor of the BMW.

Other differences are significantly smaller: The Škoda's trunk opening is 2.4 in (9%) higher, the loading edge of the Škoda is 1.2 in (5%) higher above the road, the depth (loading edge → floor) is 0.4 in greater in the Škoda, the narrowest width of the trunk is 2.8 in (7%) larger in the BMW, and the opening width is 1.2 in (3%) larger in the BMW.

Implications for Usability

Due to the significantly longer loading area in the BMW (14%/36%), long items can be transported more easily — even when the rear seats are in use.

This makes the 5 Series Touring more practical for transporting skis, long furniture parts, building materials, or bicycle parts without disassembly. With fully folded seats, it also offers more usable cargo volume for bulky loads.

The smaller differences (under 10%) only slightly affect everyday usability: The somewhat higher trunk opening of the Škoda can make loading tall items easier, while the higher loading edge slightly complicates lifting heavy loads.

The slightly larger minimum width in the BMW and the wider opening are advantageous when fitting wide items but have only a moderate effect.

Conclusion: Those who frequently transport long or bulky items or need maximum loading length with partially used seats clearly benefit from the BMW 5 Series Touring. For normal everyday use, the Škoda Elroq remains compact and practical, with mostly minor deviations.