Trunk comparison: BMW i4 vs Dacia Jogger

Biggest Differences (highlighted: >10%)

With the first row of seats upright, the trunk of the Dacia Jogger is 7.1 in (≈18%) longer than that of the BMW i4. The trunk opening of the Jogger is 9.8 in (≈37%) higher, and the narrowest point in the Jogger's trunk is 13 in (≈38%) wider than in the i4. Conversely, the trunk depth of the BMW i4 (measured from the loading edge to the trunk floor) is 0.8 in (≈25%) greater than that of the Jogger.

Not in the highlighted range (>10%) are: with seats fully folded down, the Jogger is only 1.2 in (2%) longer than the i4, the width of the trunk opening is 3.5 in (10%) larger on the Jogger (exactly 10%), and the loading edge of the i4 is 1.6 in (≈6%) higher above the road.

What are the implications of these differences for usability?

The significantly greater clear height of the opening and the larger width at the narrowest point make the Dacia Jogger clearly more practical for bulky, tall, or wide items (e.g., boxes, furniture with edges, bulky sports equipment).

The higher interior length dimension with the rear seat upright also means that the Jogger can accommodate longer items in everyday use with full passenger seating (e.g., skis, slats, long boxes).

The BMW i4 scores with the greater installed depth of the trunk (loading edge → trunk floor). This is advantageous when items need to be stored flatter and closer to the center of gravity or when stacking boxes/crates that require more vertical depth than height.

However, the slightly higher loading edge of the i4 makes lifting heavy loads a bit more difficult compared to the Jogger.

In practical summary: For regular transport of wide, tall, or long items while carrying passengers, the Dacia Jogger is the better choice. For organized, deeper stacked cargo or when the shape of the load fits better in depth than height, the BMW i4 offers advantages.