Trunk comparison: BMW i4 vs Jeep Avenger Electric

Key Differences and Their Practical Significance

In terms of cargo space, the BMW i4 is clearly ahead: with the seats folded down, it offers +16.5 in (31%) more loading area and with the first row upright even +12.2 in (46%) longer trunk than the Jeep Avenger.

Practically, this means the i4 accommodates significantly longer items (e.g., slats, skis, or flat furniture parts) better and overall provides more usable loading length for continuous or elongated cargo, making loading long goods much more flexible.

On the other hand, the Jeep Avenger has a higher trunk opening: the opening height is +4.7 in (18%) greater than in the BMW i4. This is noticeable when loading tall or bulky items, as upright transport is possible and less sideways or angled fitting is needed.

Smaller differences include: the trunk depth (loading edge to floor) is 0.4 in (+10%) greater in the Avenger, the loading edge is 0.8 in (+3%) higher, and the narrowest width or opening width is 2–2 in (2–5%) larger in the Avenger — these points have only a minor impact in everyday use.

Conclusion: For longitudinally oriented cargo and more trunk volume, the BMW i4 is the better choice. For easier loading of tall or bulky items, the Jeep Avenger is more practical thanks to the larger opening; however, its other advantages are minor and affect usability less strongly.