Trunk comparison: BMW i4 vs Skoda Karoq

Key Differences

The measurements show that the BMW i4 leads in usable loading length: with the seats folded down, the i4 offers a loading area that is 7.9 in (13%) longer than the Karoq, and with the first row of seats upright, the advantage is even more pronounced with 8.7 in (29%) more length in favor of the i4. In contrast, the Škoda Karoq scores points in height, depth, and width: the trunk opening is 9.8 in (37%) higher, the depth (loading edge to trunk floor) is 2 in (50%) greater, the narrowest width of the cargo space is 5.1 in (15%) larger, and the opening width is 3.9 in (11%) wider than in the BMW i4. The loading edge of the i4 is slightly higher (+0.8 in / 3%) than that of the Karoq.

Impact on Usability

The length advantages of the BMW i4 make it more practical for long, flat loads: bulky items like slats, skis, or long boxes are easier to accommodate, especially when the rear seats are folded down.

However, because the i4 has significantly less opening height, shallower depth, and narrower widths, loading and positioning tall, bulky, or wide items is more difficult.

The Škoda Karoq is better suited for everyday use with irregularly shaped cargo: the higher trunk opening and greater depth and width make it easier to load bulky, tall, or wide objects (strollers, large boxes, furniture parts).

The slightly lower loading edge makes lifting heavy items somewhat more comfortable, even though this difference is small.

In short: Those who frequently transport long, flat loads benefit from the BMW i4. Those who more often have bulky, tall, or wide cargo or value comfortable loading are better served by the Škoda Karoq.