Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: BMW iX1 vs Dacia Jogger

Trunk comparison: BMW iX1 vs Dacia Jogger

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the BMW iX1 and Dacia Jogger
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the BMW iX1 and Dacia Jogger

Key Differences

The Dacia Jogger offers a 10.2 in (29%) longer loading length with the front seats upright than the BMW iX1. The Jogger's trunk opening is 7.9 in (28%) higher, making it easier to fit larger or taller items.

The depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor) is 2.4 in (300%) greater in the Jogger, indicating a significantly deeper interior behind the loading edge.

At its narrowest point, the Jogger's trunk is 8.3 in (21%) wider than the iX1's. Smaller differences: with the seats fully folded down, the Jogger is 6.7 in (10%) longer, the width of the trunk opening is 2.4 in (6%) larger on the iX1, and the iX1's loading edge is 2.4 in (9%) higher above the ground.

Implications for Usability

More loading length with the front seats upright (29%) makes the Jogger more practical for everyday use when transporting larger items with passengers in front — such as long packages, surfboards, or bulky goods, without folding seats down.

The significantly higher trunk opening (28%) facilitates loading bulky, tall items like boxes, furniture parts, or plants; the geometry reduces restrictions caused by opening height.

The greater depth behind the loading edge (+2.4 in, 300%) means cargo can be stored deeper and often more space-efficiently; for heavy items, lifting may be somewhat easier because more volume is available below the loading edge.

The significantly larger minimum interior width (+21%) increases the chance of laying wide items flat without needing to angle them.

The iX1 has a slightly wider opening (+6%) and a somewhat higher loading edge (+2.4 in, 9%). The wider opening can help when loading wider but flatter items; the higher loading edge makes lifting heavy loads somewhat more awkward.

Overall, the Jogger is better suited for users who frequently transport tall, long, or wide cargo or regularly need more volume with the rear seats upright. The iX1, on the other hand, offers a marginally better opening for some flat, wide items and is otherwise more suitable for users with less bulky transport needs.