Trunk comparison: BMW X2 vs Peugeot 208
Key Differences (highlighted: >10%)
The BMW X2 offers a significantly longer loading length with the seats folded down: +13.8 in (27%) more than the Peugeot 208. Even with the front seats upright, the BMW is longer: +10.2 in (39%). The width of the trunk opening on the BMW is +5.1 in (15%) larger than on the Peugeot.
The Peugeot 208 has two clear advantages in vertical dimensions: the height of the trunk opening is +3.5 in (14%) greater, and the depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is even +3.5 in (100%) larger than on the BMW X2.
The loading edge of the BMW X2 sits +3.5 in (13%) higher above the road than the Peugeot.
Impact on Usability
The longer cargo spaces in the BMW X2 (27% and 39% more length) make it significantly more practical for long items like skis, longer packages, slats, or assembled furniture.
Combined with the wider opening (+15%), wide or flat goods can be loaded and unloaded more easily – advantageous for moving, transporting sports equipment, or bulky shopping.
The Peugeot 208 scores in vertical space and ergonomics: the higher trunk opening (+14%) and the greater depth from loading edge to floor (+100%) provide more usable interior height and a larger storage volume below the loading edge.
Additionally, the loading edge is lower than on the BMW, which makes lifting heavy items easier and everyday loading (groceries, strollers, boxes) more comfortable.
The higher loading edge of the BMW (+13%) makes lifting heavy or bulky loads somewhat more difficult but in some cases offers a flatter cargo floor against sagging or protection against lateral shifting.
The slight extra width at the narrowest point (+4%, not highlighted) is usually secondary in practice compared to length and opening width.
Conclusion: If long or wide items are frequently transported, the BMW X2 is the better choice. If heavy loads, tall items, or frequent loading and unloading with less physical effort are more important, the Peugeot 208 offers more practical advantages through its lower loading edge and greater vertical capacity.