Trunk comparison: BMW X4 vs Skoda Karoq

Key Differences

Several differences stand out from the data: The BMW X4 offers a trunk that is +10.2 in (34%) longer with the front seats upright compared to the Škoda Karoq. The opening height of the Karoq, on the other hand, is +8.7 in (31%) higher.

The depth of the trunk (distance from loading edge → trunk floor) is +2.8 in (88%) greater in the Karoq. The loading edge of the BMW X4 sits +4.3 in (16%) higher above the road than that of the Karoq. Smaller differences in width (each +0.4 in / 1%) are practically negligible.

Impact on Usability

The biggest practical consequence is the different shape of the cargo space: The BMW X4 is significantly longer when the rear seats are in use – making it better suited for long items (e.g., skis, slats, longer furniture parts) without folding down the seats.

The advantage with the fully folded cargo space (+6.3 in / 10%) is present but less pronounced.

The Škoda Karoq, on the other hand, offers significantly more vertical space and a higher opening: The 31% higher opening and 88% greater depth mean more usable height behind the loading edge.

This is advantageous for tall or stacked cargo (e.g., crates, boxes, larger suitcases) and for storing bulky, tall items. Additionally, the lower loading edge of the Karoq is more practical when loading heavy goods – the BMW requires noticeably more effort to lift due to the loading edge being 4.3 in higher.

In summary: For long, flat cargo with occupied rear seats, the BMW X4 is the better choice; for tall or stacked cargo space, easier lifting, and more versatile loading geometries, the Škoda Karoq is more practical. Width differences are negligible and hardly affect usability.