Trunk comparison: Dacia Duster vs Skoda Kamiq

Key Differences (greater than 10%)

The Dacia Duster offers a cargo area that is 9.1 in longer with the first row of seats upright compared to the Škoda Kamiq (+31%). This is the most significant advantage of the Duster for longer loads with the normal seating configuration.

The Škoda Kamiq has a trunk depth that is 3.1 in greater measured from the loading edge to the trunk floor (+100% relatively stated). This means more "recess" in the footwell of the trunk compared to the Duster and thus more usable interior height directly behind the loading edge.

Impact on Usability

Dacia Duster — due to the significantly longer cargo area with the seats upright, the Duster is better suited for long items (e.g., slats, longer luggage, foldable furniture) without needing to fold down the seats.

Those who frequently transport longer, flat cargo or need more usable length in everyday use have a clear advantage here.

Škoda Kamiq — the greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor creates a deeper cargo space, which is better for stacking suitcases or bulky items that require space not only lengthwise but also in height. Additionally, a deeper cargo area makes it easier to store bulky, not-so-long items.

Briefly on the Smaller Differences

Other differences are comparatively minor: the loading edge height is 2.4 in higher on the Duster (harder to lift vs. lower on the Kamiq), the trunk opening of the Kamiq is marginally higher (+1.2 in) and slightly wider (+1.6 in), and the narrowest width is only 0.4 in higher on the Duster.

These deviations have only a minor practical impact: the Kamiq is somewhat more convenient for loading heavy loads (lower loading edge) and slightly easier for wider parts, while the Duster scores on length.