Trunk comparison: Dacia Jogger vs Mazda Mazda CX-60

Key Differences (highlighted: >10%)

The Dacia Jogger offers a +18% (≈+7.1 in) longer cargo area with the first row of seats upright compared to the Mazda CX‑60. The trunk opening of the Jogger is +21% (≈+6.3 in) higher, and the depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is significantly greater in the Jogger: +700% (≈+3.1 in) compared to the CX‑60. At its narrowest point, the Jogger's trunk is +16% (≈+6.7 in) wider.

Conversely, the loading edge of the Mazda CX‑60 is +12% (≈+3.1 in) higher above the ground (thus higher than the Jogger).

What impact do these differences have on usability?

Practically, this means: The Jogger is better suited for everyday use with passengers loaded when long items need to be transported – thanks to the +18% longer cargo area with the first row upright, longer loads fit without folding down the front seats.

The significantly higher trunk opening and especially the greater depth (loading edge → floor) make loading tall or bulky items easier: more interior height and more clearance under the loading edge. The greater narrowest interior width (+16%) also facilitates storing wide packages or boxes.

The CX‑60, on the other hand, has a higher loading edge (+12%), which makes lifting heavy items when loading more strenuous; its slightly larger opening width (+6%) is advantageous but less than 10% and hardly compensates for the mentioned disadvantages.

Differences below 10% (e.g., length with seats fully folded: +3% in favor of the Jogger) are usually negligible in practice.