Trunk comparison: Dacia Jogger vs Mercedes Benz GLB

Key Differences

The Dacia Jogger offers 8.3 in (22%) longer cargo space with the first row of seats upright than the Mercedes‑GLB. Additionally, the trunk width at the narrowest point in the Jogger is 6.3 in (15%) larger.

In contrast, the Mercedes‑GLB has a significantly deeper cargo well: the depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is 1.6 in (50%) greater in the GLB than in the Jogger.

What are the practical implications of these differences?

Longer cargo space (Jogger): The 22% greater length in a specific seating configuration makes the Jogger better suited for long items like boards, skis, or suitcases without needing to fold seats completely down.

This improves everyday usability for families and users who regularly transport longer cargo with occupied seats.

Wider narrow point (Jogger): The 15% greater width at the narrowest spot means that wide boxes, larger luggage, or bulky shopping can be more easily loaded crosswise and positioned. In practice, this means less maneuvering and less frequent angling of the cargo.

Deeper cargo well (GLB): The significantly deeper cargo well in the GLB ensures that cargo sits lower and is thus visually and sometimes also more securely stored.

Advantages include better concealment of contents and a lower center of gravity for the cargo. However, loading and unloading heavy items (especially with a higher loading edge) can be ergonomically more demanding.

Summary

For users who often transport long or wide items, the Dacia Jogger is often better suited in practice. Those who value a deeper cargo well and stored, lower-lying storage benefit from the Mercedes‑GLB.

Smaller differences (e.g., opening height or loading edge height) have less impact on everyday usability but do affect loading ergonomics.