Trunk comparison: Dacia Jogger vs Opel Grandland

Key Differences

The Dacia Jogger offers than the Opel Grandland. Additionally, the trunk opening of the Jogger is , and the narrowest point in the cargo area is than in the Grandland.

In contrast, the Opel stands out because the measured depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is and the loading edge itself is .

Smaller differences: with the seats folded down, the Jogger is only about 3.9 in (≈6%) longer, and the width of the opening is about 2 in (≈5%) larger on the Grandland – both under 10% and thus less relevant.

Impact on Usability

Due to the significantly longer cargo floor with the first row of seats upright, the Jogger is better suited when you frequently need to transport long items without folding seats down (e.g., furniture parts, long boxes).

The higher trunk opening and the larger minimum interior width make loading bulky or tall items easier and reduce the need for maneuvering when stowing.

The Grandland does have a larger opening width (a minor advantage) but shows practical limitations: the significantly greater "depth" from the loading edge to the trunk floor and the higher loading edge mean that heavy or bulky loads must be lifted higher and a greater height difference must be overcome when loading and unloading.

This can make handling boxes, trolleys, or heavy items more difficult but tends to make the Grandland more stable against shifting if the cargo is placed deeper in the cargo area.

In short: For frequent, straightforward loading of long, tall, or wide items, the Jogger is better suited; for applications where a deeper "cargo area" and a higher loading edge are desired (e.g., to store cargo lower and thus less visible), the Grandland can offer advantages.

Smaller differences (overall length with folded seats, opening width) hardly affect everyday usability.