Trunk comparison: Dacia Jogger vs Volvo XC60

Key Differences

The Dacia Jogger offers a 21% (+7.9 in) longer trunk with the first row of seats upright compared to the Volvo XC60. The trunk opening of the Jogger is also 24% (+7.1 in) higher.

Particularly notable is the measured depth (loading edge to trunk floor) of the Jogger, which is stated as +700% (+3.1 in).

Differences below ≈10% (for example, the width of the opening being about 9% larger in the XC60 or the loading edge of the XC60 being 9% higher) are significantly smaller and therefore less impactful.

Impact on Practical Use

The significantly greater cargo length with the first row of seats upright makes the Dacia Jogger more practical for long or stacked items (e.g., slats, long boxes, skis with folded rear seats) because more usable length is available.

The higher trunk opening makes loading bulky, tall items easier and improves access with voluminous cargo (for example, tall boxes or suitcases).

The much greater depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor in the Jogger means the loading surface is lower or there is more space beneath the loading edge — this helps to store bulky, tall items and increases the overall usability of the cargo space for irregularly shaped loads.

The XC60 scores only slightly with a somewhat wider opening (≈9%), which makes inserting very wide, flat items a bit easier. However, the higher values in some dimensions favoring the XC60 are below the 10% threshold and are less significant in practice. In summary: Those who primarily value maximum cargo space usability for tall, long, or irregularly shaped loads benefit more from the Dacia Jogger; those who occasionally load very wide, flat items find a slight advantage with the Volvo, which overall is smaller.