Trunk comparison: Dacia Jogger vs VW Polo

Key Differences

The Dacia Jogger offers a cargo space that is 16.1 in (30%) longer when the seats are folded down compared to the VW Polo. With the first row of seats upright, the difference is even more pronounced: the Jogger has 19.7 in (76%) more loading length.

The trunk opening of the Jogger is also significantly larger: the opening height is +9.1 in (33%) greater and the width of the opening is +4.3 in (12%) wider than the Polo.

At the narrowest point in the trunk, the Jogger is 7.5 in (19%) wider. The depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is the same in both models; however, the Polo's loading edge is 1.6 in (6%) higher above the road than the Jogger's.

Impact on Usability

The significantly greater loading length of the Jogger (especially with the first row of seats upright) makes it more practical for long items like slats, skis, or furniture parts that would not fit in the Polo.

The higher opening height of the Jogger makes it easier to load tall or bulky items and reduces the risk of bumping into the opening while loading.

The greater width at the narrowest point and the wider opening mean that wide or irregularly shaped cargo is easier to turn and position – useful for moving, sports equipment, or bulky shopping.

Since the depth (loading edge to trunk floor) is the same, both models are equal in usable interior height of the cargo space; the Jogger gains through length, width, and opening height.

The Jogger's loading edge, which is 1.6 in lower (compared to the Polo), also slightly eases lifting heavy items into the trunk, although this difference is relatively small.

In summary: For transporting taller, longer, or wider cargo or frequently loading bulky items, the Dacia Jogger offers noticeably better everyday practicality. The VW Polo remains more compact but is less suitable for large or bulky transport.