Trunk comparison: Fiat Panda vs Nissan Rogue Sport

Key Differences

The Nissan Qashqai offers significantly more cargo length: with the seats folded down, the trunk is 21.3 in (49%) longer, and with the front seats upright, 13 in (61%) longer than the Fiat Panda.

The width of the trunk opening is 4.7 in (12%) larger on the Qashqai, while the narrowest point is only slightly larger (+1.2 in / 3%).

The depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor) is 4.7 in (200%) greater on the Fiat Panda.

Additionally, the loading edge of the Qashqai sits 3.1 in (12%) higher above the road than the Panda. (The height of the Panda's trunk opening is 3.1 in or 10% larger — this difference is exactly 10% and is not highlighted here.)

Impact on Usability

The significantly greater cargo length of the Qashqai makes it more practical for long items (e.g., slats, skis, furniture parts) and for frequent use of the folded seat area. The wider trunk opening facilitates loading wider or bulkier cargo, as there is less chance of hitting the door frame.

The Panda scores with its much greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor: items sit deeper in the cargo space, are less likely to fall out, and are often more stable when loaded from the floor.

Together with the lower loading edge compared to the Qashqai, this often makes lifting heavy cargo into the vehicle easier — for heavy boxes or bulky items, the Panda has the advantage here.

The higher loading edge of the Qashqai makes lifting heavy loads more difficult compared to the Panda; however, the Qashqai wins in length and accessibility for long or wide items.

Conclusion: If you frequently transport long or wide cargo, the Qashqai is more practical. If you often load heavy, bulky, or frequently lifted items at street or parking lot level, the Panda is ergonomically more favorable.