Trunk comparison: Ford Focus Wagon vs Mazda Mazda CX-60

Key Differences

The Ford Focus Wagon offers a cargo area that is 4.3 in (6%) longer with the rear seats folded down and 2.4 in (6%) longer with the front seats upright compared to the Mazda CX‑60. The narrowest width in the trunk is 3.5 in (9%) larger in the Ford; the width of the trunk opening is 0.4 in (1%) larger in the Mazda.

The height of the Mazda's trunk opening is 2 in (7%) higher than that of the Ford.

Significant differences (>10%): The depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor) is 0.8 in (+100%) greater in the Ford — although the absolute value is small, the percentage difference is substantial. Additionally, the Mazda's loading edge is 4.3 in (+17%) higher above the ground.

Impact on Usability

The combination of a lower loading edge in the Ford and the greater trunk depth makes loading noticeably easier in everyday use: the effective lifting and tilting movement when loading heavy or bulky items is reduced, and the trunk floor sits significantly lower overall (loading edge plus additional depth together result in about a 5.1 in difference).

For frequent loading of boxes, heavy shopping bags, strollers, or bicycles, the Ford is therefore more practical.

In the Mazda, the loading edge that is 4.3 in higher requires more effort when lifting and offers less comfort when loading and unloading — a disadvantage especially with heavy loads.

Advantages of the Mazda include the slightly larger opening height (+2 in) and minimally larger opening width (+0.4 in), which can help when loading tall or bulky items, as well as possibly better ground clearance overall.

Conclusion: For users who often load heavy or long items, the Ford is practically more favorable. The Mazda scores points with vehicle height/opening dimensions and offers advantages if ground clearance or a slightly higher opening is desired.