Trunk comparison: Ford S-MAX vs Mazda Mazda CX-60
Key Differences
The Ford S‑Max offers significantly more usable loading length: when all seats are folded down, the trunk of the S‑Max is 9.8 in (14%) longer, and with the first row of seats upright, it is 5.5 in (14%) longer than in the Mazda CX‑60. This makes the S‑Max noticeably superior when transporting long items or maximizing cargo volume.
The trunk opening of the S‑Max is 6.7 in (22%) higher, making it easier to load and unload taller or bulky items. Additionally, the depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor) in the S‑Max is 1.2 in (200%) greater, resulting in more volume in the usable cargo area.
The Mazda CX‑60, on the other hand, has a significantly higher loading edge: the loading opening of the CX‑60 sits 6.7 in (30%) higher above the road than the S‑Max.
This can make lifting heavy items in and out more difficult but is typical for higher-riding SUV models. Smaller differences in width (narrowest point: CX‑60 +0.4 in / opening width: CX‑60 +1.2 in) are under 10% and hardly noticeable in practice.
Implications for Usability
Due to the greater loading length and raised opening of the S‑Max, longer and taller items can be transported more easily (e.g., furniture parts, long boxes, or sports equipment).
The greater depth improves stackability and actual cargo volume. The lower loading edge of the S‑Max reduces the effort required to lift heavy loads into the trunk.
In the Mazda CX‑60, the higher loading edge is a disadvantage for lifting heavy items; however, the SUV body style may offer advantages for getting in and out or off-road tasks (not derivable from the available data). The slightly greater opening width of the CX‑60 plays little role in most loading situations.
In summary: For users who frequently transport long, tall, or heavy cargo, the S‑Max is the more practical choice due to length, opening height, depth, and lower loading edge.
The CX‑60 remains roughly comparable with minor width differences but has a clearly noticeable disadvantage when loading due to the higher loading edge.