Trunk comparison: Ford S-MAX vs Renault Clio

Key Differences

The Ford S‑Max offers significantly more cargo length: with seats folded down by +26 in (50%) and with the front row upright by +16.1 in (58%) compared to the Renault Clio.

The trunk opening of the S‑Max is +7.5 in (26%) higher, and the loading edge of the S‑Max sits +13 in (138%) higher above the road than in the Clio.

In the Renault Clio, the depth between the loading edge and the trunk floor is +29.1 in (2467%) greater than in the S‑Max. Width differences are minor: the narrowest trunk spot in the S‑Max is only +0.8 in (2%) wider, the opening +2.4 in (6%) — both under 10% and therefore insignificant.

Impact on Usability

More cargo length in the S‑Max practically means: longer items (e.g., slats, skis, furniture parts) can be transported much more easily, and even with normal seating, there is more space for luggage or shopping volume. For families, moves, or hobbies with bulky equipment, the S‑Max is therefore more versatile.

The higher trunk opening of the S‑Max makes loading tall or bulky items easier and reduces the chance of bumping into the opening. However, the loading edge of the S‑Max is significantly higher above the road, meaning heavy luggage must be lifted higher — this complicates everyday loading.

The Clio, on the other hand, has a very large depth from the loading lip to the trunk floor. Practically, this means a lower cargo floor: small items sink deeper into the trunk, large or bulky parts lie lower, and accessing the interior requires more bending or reaching.

The combination of a lower loading edge and deeper cargo floor can reduce the need to lift items directly from the ground but makes removing items from the footwell less comfortable and limits usability for very tall items.

In summary: Those who frequently transport long or large loads or value flexible interior space benefit significantly from the S‑Max.

Those who mostly carry smaller loads and prefer a lower loading edge will find the Clio offers a more compact but deeper cargo floor — with compromises in handling and bulky items. Width of the opening and narrow spots differ little and hardly affect everyday usability.