Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Ford S-MAX vs Volvo XC60

Trunk comparison: Ford S-MAX vs Volvo XC60

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Ford S-MAX and Volvo XC60
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Ford S-MAX and Volvo XC60

Biggest Differences (highlighted)

The Ford S‑Max offers noticeable advantages in trunk space length and height: with seats folded down, the S‑Max's trunk is 7.9 in (11%) longer and with the first row of seats upright, 6.3 in (17%) longer than the Volvo XC60. Additionally, the trunk opening of the S‑Max is 7.5 in (26%) higher, and the depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is 1.2 in (200%) greater in the S‑Max.

In contrast, the Volvo XC60 has a significantly higher loading edge: the XC60's loading edge is 5.9 in (26%) higher above the road than the S‑Max.

Smaller differences favoring the Volvo are the width at the narrowest point (+3.1 in, 8%) and the width of the trunk opening (+2.4 in, 6%); these are below the 10% threshold and are not highlighted here.

Implications for Usability

The longer dimensions and higher opening of the Ford S‑Max specifically mean: longer items (e.g., slats, skis, long boxes, or disassembled furniture) are easier to transport, especially when seats are folded down.

The higher trunk opening and greater depth simplify loading taller, bulky items and overall create a more spacious cargo volume.

The significantly lower loading edge of the S‑Max makes lifting heavy loads (boxes, strollers, toolboxes) easier — less effort is needed to lift over the loading edge and loading from a lower height is improved.

Conversely, the higher loading edge of the XC60 makes loading heavy items more difficult but can be advantageous on very uneven terrain or with higher ground clearance.

The Volvo XC60 scores in usable widths: the slightly greater narrowest width and wider opening make it easier to load wide items or maneuver luggage sideways.

However, these advantages are moderate (under 10%) and in most everyday situations are less significant than the clearly larger length and height advantages of the S‑Max.

Conclusion: Those who frequently transport long or tall items and value easy loading of heavy loads benefit more from the Ford S‑Max. Those who occasionally transport wider, flat luggage and can tolerate a somewhat higher loading edge will find the Volvo XC60 a solid but less cargo-friendly alternative.