Trunk comparison: Ford S-MAX vs VW Polo

Key Differences

The Ford S‑Max offers significantly more cargo space and easier access: with the seats folded down, the trunk of the S‑Max is 23.6 in (+43 %) longer than that of the VW Polo, and with the first row of seats upright, it is even 18.1 in (+70 %) longer.

The trunk opening of the S‑Max is 9.4 in (+35 %) higher and the width of the opening is 5.5 in (+15 %) larger than that of the Polo.

In contrast, the VW Polo has a greater depth (loading edge to trunk floor): +2 in (+167 %) in favor of the Polo, and the loading edge of the Polo is 5.1 in (+23 %) higher above the ground. The narrowest width in the trunk differs by only 0.4 in (1 %) in favor of the S‑Max, which is negligible.

Impact on Usability

The S‑Max is clearly advantageous when it comes to transporting long or large items: the significantly greater interior length (both with folded seats and with the first row upright) and the wider and higher opening make loading furniture, sports equipment, or bulky luggage easier.

The lower loading edge of the S‑Max also reduces physical strain when lifting heavy loads.

The Polo scores with a greater installation depth (between loading edge and floor), which can create more interior volume in height below the opening for flat, tall loads.

This is practical when items need to be stored compactly. However, the higher loading edge makes loading and unloading bulky or heavy items less comfortable, and the narrower opening limits loading wider parts.

Conclusion

For families, frequent transport of large/bulky cargo, or moves, the Ford S‑Max is clearly better suited due to its length, opening height, and width.

The VW Polo remains a compact solution with a somewhat deeper cargo area, better suited for everyday use, parking in tight city spaces, and smaller luggage, but it is significantly more limited when loading and transporting long or wide items.