Trunk comparison: Hyundai Elantra GT Wagon vs Mazda Mazda CX-60

Key Statements

The Hyundai i30 Wagon offers a slightly longer loading length: with the seats folded down about +2 in (≈3%) and with the first row of seats upright about +2.8 in (≈7%) compared to the Mazda CX-60. The loading depths are the same, and the narrowest trunk width differs only slightly (+2% in favor of the Mazda).

However, three differences favor the Mazda: the height of the trunk opening is about +13% higher, the width of the trunk opening is about +11% larger, and the loading edge is about +19% higher above the road.

Impact on Usability

The greater opening height (+13%) and wider opening (+11%) of the CX-60 make it easier to load and pass through tall or bulky items (e.g., furniture, boxes, sports equipment) and reduce the risk of hitting the upper edge.

At the same time, the significantly higher loading edge (+19%) makes lifting heavy items into the trunk more difficult: loading requires more effort and is less comfortable for people with limited strength or mobility.

The i30 Wagon has a clear advantage with its lower loading edge when lifting and frequently loading and unloading heavy loads.

The slightly longer loading length of the i30 (3–7% more in each case) is advantageous for longer, flat-loadable goods (e.g., slats, skis, long boxes), but has only a moderate effect in everyday use.

Since the floor depth is the same and the narrowest width is almost identical, there are no practical disadvantages favoring either model here.

In summary: Those who frequently transport tall or wide items and benefit from the larger opening dimensions are better off with the Mazda CX-60. Those who often lift heavy loads or value easy loading and unloading with a low loading edge have the advantage with the Hyundai i30 Wagon.

For longer, flat-loaded items, the i30 has a small but noticeable advantage.