Trunk comparison: Hyundai Kona vs Skoda Elroq

Key Differences

The most noticeable difference lies in the depth of the cargo floor: the depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor) of the Hyundai Kona is 1.6 in, or about 400% greater than that of the Škoda Elroq.

Other, but significantly smaller differences are: the Kona offers about +2.4 in (≈8%) more cargo length with the first row of seats upright, while the Elroq leads by +0.4 in (≈1%) with the seats folded down.

The trunk opening of the Kona is approximately +0.8 in (≈3%) higher, the narrowest interior width is +1.6 in (≈4%) larger in the Kona, and the opening width is +0.4 in (≈1%) wider. The loading edge of the Elroq sits about +0.4 in higher above the road than that of the Kona.

Impact on Usability

The significantly greater loading depth of the Kona has the strongest effect on practical usability: the deeper cargo space allows taller or bulkier items to be transported more stably and with less overhang, which makes loading boxes, bags, or bulky cargo easier and effectively increases the usable volume.

In the Elroq, the very shallow depth limits the ability to load tall items without overhang or special securing.

The slightly longer cargo length of the Kona with seats upright (≈8%) makes it more flexible for longer luggage in everyday use; however, the 0.4 in longer cargo space of the Elroq with seats folded down is negligible.

The slightly higher trunk opening and larger interior width of the Kona make loading wider or bulkier items somewhat easier, while the 0.4 in higher loading edge of the Elroq minimally complicates lifting when loading.

Overall, the Kona offers a more practical loading area for variously sized and tall cargo situations due to its significantly greater depth and mostly marginally better dimensions; the Elroq remains sufficient for flat, elongated, or standardized luggage but is more limited with tall or bulky cargo.