Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Jeep Avenger Electric vs Mazda Mazda CX-60

Trunk comparison: Jeep Avenger Electric vs Mazda Mazda CX-60

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Jeep Avenger Electric and Mazda Mazda CX-60
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Jeep Avenger Electric and Mazda Mazda CX-60

Key Differences

The Mazda CX-60 offers significantly more cargo length: with the seats folded down, the trunk is 15.4 in (29%) longer, and with the first row upright, it is 12.2 in (46%) longer than in the Jeep Avenger Electric. Additionally, the narrowest point of the trunk in the Mazda is 5.5 in (16%) wider.

In contrast, the Jeep Avenger Electric has a significantly greater depth (measured from the loading edge to the trunk floor): this is 4.3 in (1000%) larger than in the Mazda.

Smaller differences include: the height of the trunk opening is 1.2 in (4%) higher in the Jeep, the Mazda's loading edge is 0.8 in (3%) higher above the road, and the width of the Mazda's trunk opening is 3.9 in (10%) larger.

Impact on Usability

The longer loading dimensions and the greater narrowest width in the Mazda make it clearly more practical for long and bulky items: furniture boards, bicycles with the front wheel removed, skis, or longer luggage are easier to accommodate.

Also, for regular transport of large suitcases or during moves, the Mazda overall offers more usable cargo space.

The greater depth of the Jeep (loading edge → trunk floor) means more vertical installation depth behind the loading edge. This can be advantageous when items need to be secured or hidden in a deeper recess (more "depth space"), but it reduces convenience when sliding very flat, long items over the loading edge.

Additionally, a deeper recess can make stacking boxes more stable, while lifting heavy items may be somewhat less comfortable depending on how high the loading edge is above the road.

In summary: For users who primarily need length and interior width (long, wide loads, frequent transport of luggage/furniture), the Mazda CX-60 is the more suitable choice.

Those who benefit from a deeper cargo recess (hidden/deepened cargo, more stable stacking in depth) will find an advantage in the Jeep Avenger Electric. Smaller differences in loading height and opening have only minor practical effects.