Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Jeep Avenger Electric vs Mercedes Benz GLB

Trunk comparison: Jeep Avenger Electric vs Mercedes Benz GLB

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Jeep Avenger Electric and Mercedes Benz GLB
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Jeep Avenger Electric and Mercedes Benz GLB

Key Differences

The Mercedes‑Benz GLB offers significantly more cargo space than the Jeep Avenger Electric: with the seats folded down, the GLB is +16.9 in (32%) longer and with the first row of seats upright, it is +11 in (42%) longer.

Additionally, the height of the trunk opening on the GLB is +3.5 in (11%) greater and the width at the narrowest point is +5.9 in (17%) wider.

Smaller differences such as the loading edge height (the same) or the trunk depth (+0.4 in / 9%) are negligible, as is the slightly larger width of the trunk opening on the GLB (+2.8 in / 7%).

What Impact Do These Differences Have on Usability?

The significantly greater length with folded seats makes the GLB better suited for long, bulky items (e.g., furniture parts, construction panels, longer luggage) and for transports requiring maximum cargo space.

The also significantly greater length with the first row of seats upright means the GLB offers more usable cargo space even when seats are not fully folded down — practical for luggage on family trips or large shopping loads with occupied seats.

The higher trunk opening on the GLB makes loading tall or bulky items easier because less tilting or turning is needed; this reduces effort and the risk of damage during loading.

The greater narrowest width improves the ability to fit wide loads (e.g., two suitcases side by side, wider boxes, or household appliances) without awkward maneuvering.

For users, this means practically: Those who regularly transport long or wide loads, often travel fully loaded, or make family trips with lots of luggage will notice clear advantages with the GLB.

The Avenger Electric, on the other hand, remains sufficient for everyday use with smaller to medium loading requirements and is likely more compact in tight urban situations – but purely based on trunk data, it is inferior to the GLB in capacity and flexibility.