Trunk comparison: Jeep Avenger Electric vs Volvo V90
Key Differences
The Volvo V90 offers significantly more cargo length: +23.6 in (≈45%) with the seats folded down and +18.5 in (≈70%) with the front row upright. Additionally, the Volvo is about ≈15% (≈5.9 in) wider at the narrowest point in the trunk, and the trunk opening itself is ≈15% (≈5.9 in) wider than the Jeep's.
The Jeep Avenger Electric shows different values: The trunk opening is ≈13% (≈3.5 in) higher, the depth between the loading edge and the trunk floor is ≈1000% (≈4.3 in) greater (floor sits significantly lower), and the loading edge is ≈18% (≈4.3 in) higher above the road.
Impact on Usability
Volvo V90 – Advantages in length and width: Due to the significantly greater cargo length (both with folded seats and fully upright seating) as well as the larger width, the V90 is better suited for long or wide loads such as slats, furniture boards, skis, or multiple large suitcases.
The wider opening makes loading bulky items easier and reduces maneuvering effort when loading.
Jeep Avenger Electric – Advantages in height and depth, but with handling drawbacks: The Jeep offers a higher trunk opening and a significantly deeper cargo floor relative to the loading edge. This facilitates accommodating tall or bulky items deep in the trunk and can help tall loads fit better vertically.
At the same time, the loading edge is considerably higher above the road, making heavy luggage or bulky loads more strenuous to lift and less back-friendly to load. The narrower width and shorter length compared to the Volvo considerably limit volume and the ability to carry wide or long items.
Practical Recommendation
Those who frequently transport long or wide loads or need a lot of luggage space with full occupancy are better served by the Volvo V90. Those who more often need to accommodate tall or bulky items deep in the trunk and prioritize vertical height can benefit from the Jeep Avenger Electric—but must factor in the higher lifting effort due to the raised loading edge.