Trunk comparison: Jeep Avenger Electric vs Volvo XC60

Key Differences

The Volvo XC60 offers +17.3 in (33%) more trunk length with the seats folded down and +11.4 in (43%) more length with the first row upright, providing significantly more cargo length than the Jeep Avenger Electric.

Additionally, the trunk width at the narrowest point is +8.3 in (23%) greater in the Volvo, and the trunk opening width is +5.1 in (13%) larger. The Jeep Avenger Electric, on the other hand, has a significantly greater depth between the loading edge and the trunk floor: +4.3 in (1000%) compared to the Volvo.

Impact on Usability

The greater length (Volvo) allows for transporting longer items — especially with the seats folded down, increasing flexibility for bulky or long cargo (e.g., furniture parts, longer sports equipment).

The wider narrowest point and larger opening width in the Volvo make loading wider or awkward items easier and reduce the risk of parts hitting the sides.

The 4.3 in greater depth in the Jeep means the trunk floor sits significantly lower below the loading edge.

Practically, this means heavy or bulky items must be placed further down when lifting in (greater lifting angle), requiring more reach when loading, but smaller items lie more securely in a deeper well and are less likely to roll out.

Since the loading edge height is the same for both vehicles, the force needed to lift onto the loading edge does not differ, but the handling when placing items into the trunk well does.

The slightly higher trunk opening of the Jeep (+2 in / 7%) is minor and hardly noticeable in practice. Overall, the Volvo XC60 is the more practical choice for users who frequently transport long or wide cargo.

The Jeep Avenger offers advantages with its deeper well for smaller, securely stowed luggage but may show limitations when loading larger or very flat cargo.