Trunk comparison: Jeep Compass vs Peugeot 208

Key Differences

The Jeep Compass offers a significantly longer cargo area when folding down all seats: +13.4 in (26%) compared to the Peugeot 208. Even with the first row of seats upright, the Compass is noticeably larger: +5.9 in (22%) trunk length. The trunk opening of the Compass is higher: +3.9 in (13%).

Conversely, the Peugeot 208 has a slightly greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor: +0.8 in (13%) in favor of the Peugeot.

The width of the trunk opening is also significantly larger in the Compass: +6.7 in (20%). Smaller differences (e.g., loading edge height +2.4 in/8% favoring the Compass, width at the narrowest point +0.4 in/1%) exist but are less significant.

What does this mean for usability?

The larger length dimensions of the Compass (both with folded and upright seats) make it more practical for longer items such as furniture parts, long boxes, skis, or disassembled bicycles.

The significantly wider trunk opening facilitates loading and unloading wide or bulky cargo (e.g., strollers, large boxes), and the higher opening height makes it easier to lift tall items in or maneuver bulky parts vertically.

The Peugeot scores with the slightly greater interior "depth" between the loading edge and floor: this additional 0.8 in depth can help when stacking smaller items or securely placing flat cargo, but it has a much smaller impact on the ability to transport large, long, or wide objects.

Additionally, the loading edge of the Compass (although not >10% difference) is somewhat higher, which requires more effort when lifting heavy loads—a practical disadvantage compared to the lower loading edge of the Peugeot.

Conclusion: Those who frequently transport longer or wider cargo will noticeably benefit from the Jeep Compass. For daily city use with mostly small to medium-sized items, the Peugeot 208 is sufficient due to its more compact design and slightly different interior geometry.