Trunk comparison: Jeep Compass vs Peugeot 3008

Key Differences

The Peugeot 3008 offers a trunk that is 6.7 in (21%) longer with the first row of seats upright than the Jeep Compass. This means more usable cargo length with the rear seats occupied.

The Jeep Compass also has a depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor that is 2 in (45%) greater, providing a significantly deeper cargo area below the loading edge.

Smaller differences (under 10%) concern the height of the trunk opening (Jeep +2.8 in / 9%), the loading edge height above the road (Peugeot +1.2 in / 4%), the narrowest width in the trunk (Peugeot +1.6 in / 4%), and the width of the trunk opening (Jeep +0.4 in / 1%).

Impact on Everyday Usability

Peugeot 3008 — longer usable cargo floor with seats occupied: The 21% greater cargo length with the first row of seats upright allows transporting longer items without folding down the rear seats (e.g., skis, long boxes, furniture panels).

This increases everyday usability for users who often travel with passengers but still want to transport longer cargo.

Jeep Compass — significantly deeper cargo area below the loading edge: The 45% greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor means items can be lowered further into the cargo space.

This helps when storing bulky or voluminous cargo that should not extend above the loading edge and makes it easier to prevent luggage from blocking the tailgate. Additionally, cargo can be stored deeper and thus often more stably; this is practical for heavy or tall-loading items.

In summary: If you frequently transport longer items with occupied rear seats, the Peugeot 3008 has the advantage.

If you often secure bulky or tall cargo and want to maximize usable volume below the loading edge, the Jeep Compass is better suited. Smaller differences in opening and loading edge height as well as widths only slightly affect everyday use.