Trunk comparison: Jeep Compass vs Peugeot 5008
Overview
The biggest differences concern the length, depth, and width of the trunk. The Peugeot 5008 offers more cargo length in longitudinal configurations, while the Jeep Compass scores with available cargo space when all seats are upright, as well as with the depth of the cargo well.
These differences influence which types of loads and everyday situations are better covered by each vehicle.
Trunk Lengths
With seats folded down, the Peugeot 5008 is 9.1 in (14%) longer than the Jeep Compass; with the first row upright, the Peugeot is also 9.1 in (28%) longer. This clearly makes the 5008 superior for long items transported with folded seats (e.g., furniture parts, long boards, or skis).
Conversely, when all seats are upright, the Jeep Compass has 18.9 in (141%) more trunk length than the 5008 — a significant advantage for users who regularly drive fully occupied and still need to fit larger luggage in the regular trunk.
Depth of the Cargo Well and Loading Edge
The depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is 5.9 in (1500%) greater in the Jeep Compass, meaning a significantly deeper cargo well. This allows bulky or tall items to be placed deeper, gaining volume but also making reaching in and lifting out more difficult.
Additionally, the loading edge of the Compass is 3.1 in (12%) higher above the road, which makes handling heavy loads more strenuous. The height of the trunk opening is only slightly higher on the Compass (+2 in / 6%), which is not a significant factor.
Width and Opening Dimensions
The width at the narrowest point is 7.1 in (19%) greater in the Peugeot 5008, making it easier to fit wider items. The width of the trunk opening is 3.9 in (10%) larger on the 5008, a small advantage when sliding in large items, but it does not reach the >10% threshold for emphasis.
Practical Consequences for Usability
Those who frequently transport long or wide items and want flexible seat folding benefit from the Peugeot 5008 (longer cargo area with folded seats, greater narrow width).
Those who often drive with full seating and still need to accommodate larger luggage have the more practical everyday trunk with the Jeep Compass (significantly longer cargo area with upright seats, deep cargo well).
One should note the higher loading edge on the Compass: lifting heavy or bulky loads is more strenuous, but the deeper cargo well can compensate volume-wise if lifting in is not an issue.
Conclusion
Peugeot 5008 = better for longer and wider loads with folded seats. Jeep Compass = better with full occupancy and for applications benefiting from a deep cargo well, but with a higher loading edge.