Trunk comparison: Jeep Compass vs VW ID.4

Biggest Differences

When comparing the two models, two differences stand out clearly: The VW ID.4 offers a 4.7 in (+15%) longer trunk with the first row of seats upright than the Jeep Compass. Conversely, the trunk depth (loading edge to trunk floor) is 2.4 in (+60%) greater in the Jeep Compass than in the VW ID.4.

Impact on Usability

The 15% longer loading length in the ID.4 with the first row of seats upright makes it more practical for longer items without folding the seats — such as long boxes, skis, or furniture parts that wouldn’t fit crosswise. If you often transport long, bulky items, the ID.4 offers a noticeable advantage in everyday use.

The significantly greater trunk depth of the Jeep Compass means more vertical storage space behind the loading edge. This is advantageous if you like to pack high (stacked suitcases, tall boxes) or if the loading floor is lower, creating more room.

However, the loading edge of the Compass is somewhat higher above the ground, which can make lifting heavy items in more difficult — for heavy or frequent loading, this is less comfortable than in the ID.4.

Other, smaller differences: The VW ID.4 has about +1.6 in more width at the narrowest point and at the opening compared to the Compass; with the seats folded down, the cargo volume differs only minimally (+1.6 in or 2% in favor of the ID.4).

The trunk opening of the Compass is about 2 in higher, which can make loading tall items easier without folding the seats. However, these differences are clearly smaller than the two points highlighted above and have a more moderate practical effect.

Conclusion

For elongated cargo without folding the seats, the VW ID.4 is the better choice. For more usable depth and stacked cargo, the Jeep Compass is better suited but compensates with a somewhat higher loading edge.

Which option is more favorable depends on the preferred cargo: long items → ID.4; tall/stacked or lower-lying cargo → Compass.