Trunk comparison: Jeep Renegade vs Mazda Mazda CX-60

Key Differences (>10%)

The Mazda CX‑60 offers a +7.9 in (13%) longer cargo floor length with the seats folded down and a +8.3 in (27%) longer usable length when the front row is upright, compared to the Jeep Renegade. The trunk opening of the Jeep Renegade is +5.1 in (17%) higher than that of the Mazda.

Additionally, the Jeep has a significantly greater loading depth: the distance from the loading edge to the trunk floor is +5.5 in (1300%) larger in the Renegade. Finally, the width of the trunk opening is +4.3 in (11%) larger on the Mazda than on the Jeep.

Implications for Usability

More length in the Mazda (with seats folded and especially with the front row upright) makes it better suited for long items like slatted bed bases, long packages, skis, or furniture parts. In situations where the rear seats need to be used, the CX‑60 still offers more usable loading length than the Renegade.

The greater width of the trunk opening on the Mazda makes it easier to load wide items, bulky boxes, or strollers; combined with the longer cargo floor, this overall provides better conditions for large and flat loads.

The Jeep scores with vertical space: the higher trunk opening facilitates loading tall or bulky items.

The significantly greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor means a "deep loading tub" — advantage: items can be stored deeper and thus more protected and less visible; disadvantage: heavy items must be lifted over the loading edge or lowered further when loading, which can make loading more strenuous and limits flat, continuous cargo surfaces.

In summary: For longer and wider loads, the Mazda CX‑60 is more advantageous. For tall or bulky items and a deeper, protected cargo floor, the Jeep Renegade is preferable. The few percentage differences in loading edge height are minor and hardly affect practical use.