Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-60 vs Durchschnitt Wagon

Key Differences

The models are similar in several dimensions (with seats folded down, the trunk length is the same; narrowest width is the same).

Noticeable differences (>10%) exist in trunk depth and loading edge height: The depth between the loading edge and trunk floor is significantly greater in the average wagon – +1.6 in (300%) – meaning the trunk floor lies considerably lower behind the loading edge.

Additionally, the loading edge of the Mazda CX-60 is higher than that of the average wagon – +4.3 in (17%).

Impact on Usability

The greater depth in the wagon practically means more "sinking space" behind the loading edge: bulky or somewhat taller cargo can be stored further down without protruding far above the loading edge.

This increases the capacity for irregular or stackable cargo and makes sliding cargo into the interior easier. However, when placing smaller or heavier items, one must reach or lower further down, which can make securing or repositioning ergonomically more difficult.

The higher loading edge of the Mazda makes lifting luggage from the ground into the cargo area more strenuous – especially with heavy loads, the required lift is greater.

Combined with the significantly shallower depth, this means for the CX-60: less deep storage space directly behind the loading edge and thus more limited options for very bulky or awkward items; loading heavy items is overall less comfortable due to the higher loading edge.