Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-60 vs Nissan Rogue Sport

Highlighted Differences (>10%)

The Mazda CX‑60 offers a cargo length that is 4.3 in (13%) longer with the first row of seats upright than the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai has a cargo floor that is 2.4 in (500%) deeper (measured from loading edge to trunk floor) than the Mazda.

Impact on Practical Use

The greater cargo length of the CX‑60 with the first row upright means: longer items can be transported without folding down additional seats.

This is practical if you regularly combine long cargo pieces with two or more passengers (e.g., skis, slats, long boxes) or if you want to use the interior flexibly for length-heavy cargo.

The significantly deeper cargo floor in the Qashqai results in more volume usable below the loading edge, allowing heavy or compact items to lie lower in the trunk.

This increases the usable capacity for stackable groceries or luggage but also creates a slightly higher lift height when loading, since the Qashqai's loading edge is about 1.2 in higher above the road. In practice, this means: Qashqai offers more "deep" storage space, CX‑60 more usable length without folding seats.

Besides the highlighted points, smaller differences affect everyday usability: The trunk opening of the Qashqai is about 1.6 in higher and approximately 1.2 in wider than that of the CX‑60, which makes loading tall or wide items easier. Both models have the same width at the narrowest point.

Conclusion: If you often need to transport longer parts with passengers onboard, the Mazda CX‑60 has the advantage. If you prefer more usable depth and somewhat more concealed storage volume (e.g., for boxes, groceries, or luggage stored lower), the Nissan Qashqai is more practical.