Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-60 vs Peugeot 3008

Key Differences

The most notable difference lies in the depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor): the Peugeot 3008 is +4.3 in (1000%) deeper than the Mazda CX-60. All other measurements are significantly smaller (<10%): Mazda has +2.4 in (4%) more loading length with folded seats, Peugeot has +0.4 in (1%) more loading length with the first row upright, the trunk opening of the Peugeot is +0.8 in (3%) higher, the loading edge of the Peugeot is +2.4 in (8%) higher above the road, the narrowest trunk width is +1.2 in (3%) larger in the Mazda, and the width of the opening is +2.8 in (7%) larger in the Mazda.

Impact on Usability

The significantly greater trunk depth of the Peugeot makes it more practical for tall or bulky cargo and for stacking luggage — items can be placed further down or deeper, which increases usable volume with the same base area.

However, the Peugeot has a loading edge that is +2.4 in higher; this makes loading and unloading more difficult and less practical, especially with heavy items or repeated loading and unloading.

A higher opening height (+0.8 in on the Peugeot) helps with loading tall cargo but only partially compensates for the significantly higher loading edge.

The Mazda offers a slightly wider opening (+2.8 in) and +1.2 in more width at the narrowest point, which makes loading wider items easier and maneuvering in the trunk simpler. The slightly longer flat loading surface with folded seats (+2.4 in) can be useful for long, flat items but is not a major advantage.

In short: For more deep storage volume and better stacking, the Peugeot is the better choice; for easier handling when loading (wider opening, slightly lower loading edge) and handling wider items, the Mazda is more practical.