Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-60 vs Peugeot 5008

Key Differences

The most noticeable difference is the cargo length with all seats upright: the Mazda CX‑60 offers a trunk that is 25.2 in (188%) longer than the Peugeot 5008. Additionally, the narrowest width of the cargo space is larger in the Peugeot: at its narrowest point, the Peugeot is 4.3 in (11%) wider than the Mazda.

All other stated deviations are under 10% (e.g., folded volume +5.9 in/9% in favor of the Peugeot, opening height +1.6 in/5% in favor of the Peugeot, loading edge height +2 in/7% in favor of the Mazda).

Impact on Usability

Because the Mazda offers significantly more depth with all seats upright, it has a clear advantage if you regularly travel with a full load of passengers and still need to transport comparatively long luggage, boxes, or bulky shopping items (e.g., suitcases, strollers, long boxes).

The noticeably greater usable depth reduces the need to fold down seats and makes the Mazda more practical for everyday use with multiple occupants.

The Peugeot scores points with its greater narrow width and slightly larger opening dimensions: wider and bulky but not particularly deep items (e.g., wide boxes, furniture parts, larger sports equipment) are easier to maneuver in and out.

The slightly longer trunk length with folded seats also makes storing long items easier, but this is only a minor advantage over the Mazda.

Practical consequence of smaller differences: the slightly higher loading edge on the Mazda (+2 in) makes lifting heavy items a bit more difficult, while the marginally larger opening height and width of the Peugeot can make loading more comfortable — however, these effects are moderate.