Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-60 vs Seat Ibiza

Significant Differences (over 10%)

The Mazda CX-60 offers significantly more loading length: with the seats folded down, the trunk is 12.6 in (≈23%) longer, and with the first row of seats upright, it is 11.8 in (≈44%) longer than the SEAT Ibiza.

Additionally, the width of the trunk opening on the Mazda is 8.3 in (≈24%) larger, making it easier to load wider items through the opening. In contrast, the SEAT Ibiza has a significantly greater trunk depth measured from the loading edge to the trunk floor: the depth is 7.5 in (≈1800%) greater than on the Mazda.

Impact on Usability

Practically, this means: The Mazda CX-60 is better suited for long or wide cargo – for example, furniture parts, long tools, or sought-after ski/surf equipment – because the loading area is longer and the opening is wider. Larger or bulky items can be more easily loaded and transported horizontally.

The SEAT Ibiza offers more "vertical space" below the loading edge due to the significantly greater depth (loading edge → trunk floor).

This is advantageous when items are to be stored more in depth or stacked (e.g., low-sitting suitcases or groceries), but it can make lifting heavy loads in and out more difficult because they must be lifted from a deeper recess.

Also, long items are harder to accommodate due to the significantly shorter loading length.

In short: Mazda CX-60 = clear advantage in length and width for bulky, long cargo; SEAT Ibiza = deeper cargo space below the loading edge, but with limitations for long or wide items.