Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-60 vs Seat Leon

Summary of the Biggest Differences

With the seats folded down, the trunk of the Mazda CX‑60 is 9.4 in (16%) longer than that of the SEAT Leon. Even with the first row of seats upright, the Mazda offers 5.9 in (18%) more trunk length.

The usable depth (loading edge → trunk floor) in the SEAT Leon is significantly greater: +9.8 in (2400%) compared to the Mazda.

The narrowest width of the trunk is 9.1 in (28%) larger in the Mazda than in the SEAT Leon. The width of the trunk opening is the same for both models.

Less pronounced differences: The trunk opening of the SEAT Leon is 1.6 in (5%) higher, and the loading edge is 0.4 in (1%) higher than in the Mazda — both differences are minor.

Impact on Usability

The Mazda CX‑60 has an advantage with long or wide loads: More interior length with folded or upright seats and a larger minimum width allow for transporting long items (e.g., boards, furniture parts, skis) and wider packages without issues when loading through.

The SEAT Leon scores with deeper or tall stacking: The significantly greater trunk depth means more vertical volume and a deeper loading well — practical for tall stacks of boxes, large suitcases, or bulky crates that are placed upright.

The slightly higher opening height makes maneuvering tall items inside a bit easier.

Practically, this means: For users who frequently transport long or wide loads (craftsmen, furniture transport, sports equipment), the Mazda CX‑60 is often better suited.

Those who more often carry bulky, tall luggage or many stacked boxes benefit more from the SEAT Leon’s greater depth. The nearly identical opening width makes wide items equally manageable through the hatch in both models.