Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Kamiq

Key Differences

The Mazda CX‑60 offers significantly more length in the cargo space: with the seats folded down, the trunk is +7.9 in (13%) longer and with the first row upright, even +9.4 in (32%) longer than the Škoda Kamiq.

In contrast, the Kamiq has a higher loading opening: the opening height is +3.1 in (11%) higher than that of the Mazda.

Also very noticeable is the depth between the loading edge and the trunk floor in the Kamiq: it is +6.3 in (1500%) greater than in the CX‑60. Smaller differences, which do not exceed 10%, include a slightly higher loading edge on the Mazda (+1.6 in, 6%) as well as a slightly larger interior and opening width on the Mazda (+2 in / +2.8 in, about 5–7% each).

Implications for Usability

For long items and larger amounts of luggage, the Mazda is clearly advantageous: due to the significantly longer loading surface—especially with the rear seat upright—longer furniture pieces, skis, or multiple suitcases can be transported more easily.

The greater length volume makes the CX‑60 more practical for everyday use when longer loads need to be carried along with passengers.

The Škoda Kamiq, on the other hand, scores with high or "deep" loading: the higher opening height makes it easier to load tall items (e.g., boxes or crates), and the significantly greater depth between the loading edge and floor means more capacity in the vertical direction inside the trunk.

This is practical when goods are stacked or when the loading edge is lower, allowing bulky or taller items to be securely stored.

Minor advantages of the Mazda in loading edge height and width have only moderate effects: a slightly higher loading edge makes lifting heavy loads a bit more difficult, while the slightly greater width of the CX‑60 facilitates storing wider items but does not create a fundamental difference in usability compared to the Kamiq.