Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo V90

Biggest Differences (Briefly Summarized)

The Volvo V90 offers a significantly longer trunk: with the seats folded down, it is 8.3 in (+12%) longer, and with the first row upright, 6.3 in (+16%) longer than the Mazda CX‑60. In contrast, the loading edge of the Mazda is 5.1 in (+21%) higher above the ground than that of the Volvo.

Impact on Usability

The greater trunk length of the Volvo makes it more practical for long items and larger amounts of luggage. With the seats folded down, longer loads (e.g., long boxes, furniture parts, skis) can be accommodated more easily; even with the normal seating configuration, more usable length remains for suitcases or bags.

The significantly higher loading edge of the Mazda increases the effort required to lift heavy items into the trunk and makes it more difficult to simply slide or roll suitcases over the threshold. For frequent loading and unloading of heavy loads, the Volvo is therefore more ergonomic.

Other, smaller differences: The trunk opening of the Mazda is slightly higher (+2.4 in, ~9%) and the opening width as well as the narrowest width are minimally larger on the Volvo (+2 in and +0.4 in respectively), but these have little practical effect.