Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-60 vs VW Passat Wagon

Key Differences (>10%)

The VW Passat Wagon offers a 11 in (+28%) longer cargo space with the seats folded down and a 5.9 in (+15%) longer trunk with the first row upright compared to the Mazda CX‑60. Additionally, the trunk depth (loading edge → trunk floor) is 3.5 in (+800%) greater in the Passat.

The loading edge of the Mazda, on the other hand, is 3.9 in (+16%) higher above the ground than that of the Passat.

Impact on Usability

For transporting long items (skis, planks, furniture parts), the Passat is clearly advantageous: the significantly greater cargo length both with folded seats and upright rear bench makes loading longer parts easier and safer.

The substantially greater depth of the Passat also means that floor compartments or a deeper loading floor are present – this increases usable volume near the floor, creates space for taller or stacked cargo below the loading edge, and prevents visibility of cargo from outside.

The lower loading edge of the Passat makes lifting heavy loads into the trunk much easier; the 3.9 in higher loading edge of the Mazda makes loading boxes or heavy items more strenuous.

Conversely, the Mazda benefits from a slightly wider trunk width at the narrowest point (+3%) and a slightly wider trunk opening (+4%), which simplifies loading wider but not particularly long items. Differences in opening height (+4% in favor of the Passat) are minor and hardly noticeable in everyday use.

Conclusion: Those who frequently transport long or heavy loads and prefer easier loading are better served by the VW Passat Wagon.

Those who occasionally need to load wide, bulky parts and at the same time prefer a higher vehicle stance (e.g., SUV character) will find advantages in the Mazda CX‑60, but these lag behind the Passat in volume and loading comfort.